In a letter to MPs at the end of June, Jenrick said that he intended "to simplify the current system of use classes in England."
Central to these proposals was "to create a new broad category of 'commercial, business and service' uses which will allow commercial, retail and leisure uses greater freedom to adapt to changing circumstances," according to the letter.
Jenrick said that these planning changes sat alongside the package of measures announced by the prime minister Boris Johnson "to drive economic recovery, get Britain building again, and start an infrastructure revolution."
Jenrick's proposals build on a permitted development right introduced in May 2019 which allowed change of use of some retail uses to offices. The government has promised to introduce the latest set of changes to the use class system by the start of Parliament's summer recess at the end of July.
Giving their reaction to the latest announcements, commentators told Planning that the nature of retailing is changing rapidly and the planning system can currently be an impediment to premises adapting to accommodate such change.
However, they also emphasised the need for town centre management, so that proposed uses are compatible and the range of shops and activities is diverse.
Dominic Curran, property policy advisor at industry body the British Retail Consortium (BRC), suggested that the new use class "could help stores adapt their space for delivery centres and pick up and collect facilities" which are "all part of the current retailing model."
Ian Fletcher, director of policy at property lobby group the British Property Federation (BPF), suggested that "the new use class could help smaller businesses like nail bars that want to turn over some or all of their space to a coffee bar".
He said that the new use class "would probably be used more in smaller centres rather than help the large vacant shops in town centres."
Meanwhile, Mike Kiely, chairman of the Planning Officers Society, which represents public sector planners, said that town centres "require careful management, rather than the relaxation in planning controls".
"Planning does need to be flexible, but a broad use class could have undesirable consequences," he said.
"As new uses come into the high street, individual shops could be left isolated," said Kiely. "Town centres need to provide a coherent offer".
Steve Norris, national head of planning at consultancy Lambert Smith Hampton, echoed this concern. "There is the potential loss of viable employment uses that add to the diversity and economy of our town centres", he said.
Michael Bach, planning chair at the London Forum of Civic and Amenity Societies, raised concerns that facilities valued by local communities, would be endangered if their change of use was made easier.
"Robert Jenrick suggests in his letter to MPs that pubs and theatres could be excluded from the use class, but there are many more facilities that contribute to the vitality of a community that might be lost," said Bach. "These include village shops and local cafes".
Bach also pointed out that active street frontages could be lost as more commercially valuable uses take over.
"There could be a greater proliferation of gyms taking over ground floor shop units, if planning permission is not required," he said.
Jeremy Hinds, planning director at consultancy Savills, questioned whether the new use class would replace the existing retail classes or if it would sit alongside them.
"It is important that the existing retail use classes remain," he said.
"With the growth of new housing in town centres, councils need to be able to manage the uses around those developments," he explained.
Ben Wrighton, head of planning at consultancy Turley's London office, suggested that councils could zone their town centres in order to manage the proposed changes.
"They could limit the new use class to only the core areas where there is less housing," he said.
"This would be part of the local plan discussions and councils would need to collect evidence to support such a policy," said Wrighton.