Car-free restriction obligation deficient

The change of use of an office block in south London to 22 apartments under Class O of Part 3 to Schedule 2 of the GPDO 2015, was held to be unacceptable because it would increase on-street parking pressures.

The site lay within a controlled parking zone and no on-site parking was proposed. The appellant had submitted a unilateral obligation confirming that residents would not be allowed to apply for parking permits. However, an inspector noted that it appeared to relate to a different scheme, had not been signed by the mortgage company nor signed. Consequently, he could place no weight on it. In his opinion despite the accessibility of the site by a range of means of transport, in the absence of a mechanism which would prevent residents from applying for a parking permit, there was s risk that this would increase demand for spaces in a location where there was substantial demand.

Inspector: T Burnham; Written representations


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Join the conversation with PlanningResource on social media

Follow Us:
Planning Jobs