How councils' pre-application advice charges compare

A new survey conducted by Planning reveals huge variations across England in pre-application advice charges, with London boroughs usually charging the most. By David Dewar.

Payment: huge variation in pre-app fees revealed
Payment: huge variation in pre-app fees revealed

A developer walks into the offices of Manchester City Council and is provided with pre-application planning advice on a proposed 250-home housing development for free. The same thing happens at Leicester City Council. But when the developer takes the same scheme to almost any London borough, they are charged over £10,000 for the pre-application advice.

Similar variations in charges are seen at other levels of development, and this variety between councils, regions and various types of development is one of the main themes emerging from a new survey Planning has conducted of charges for pre-application advice.

We surveyed the pre-application advice charges in place at all London boroughs, metropolitan districts and unitary authorities across England. The survey, carried out in May and early June, sought to establish the minimum fee levels for each authority for various different development scenarios, ranging from a householder development to a 10,000 square metre office scheme.


The results show that the fees typically range from tens of thousands of pounds for major schemes in London, to hundreds of pounds for small schemes outside London, to eleven authorities which impose no pre-application advice charges at all in any category.

What single tier councils charge: minimum pre-application advice charges for various development scenarios 


The highest rate for any of our development scenarios is at Central Bedfordshire Council, which charges just over £26,000 including VAT for schemes of a minimum of units. For schemes of 100 new homes, the highest rate is at Ealing Council, where a minimum of £18,000 would be charged for pre-application advice for such schemes. 

A spokesperson for Central Bedfordshire Council says the fee allows the authority to provide a "comprehensive" response, including a meeting and written response. The spokesperson says the level of the fee "reflects the complexity and scale of the proposals and the level of staffing required, as a development of that size requires a higher level of specialist technical advice."


A major thread running through the results is that the vast majority of the highest charges in all categories are levied by London boroughs. Thirteen authorities charge £10,000 or more for housing schemes of 250 units, and nine of these are London boroughs, with the rates for Ealing (£18,000) and Tower Hamlets (£15,360) among the next highest after Central Bedfordshire, along with the figure for Birmingham (£18,000).

Ealing Council reports that its fee level is based on "a number of factors relating to the costs of the process". It says its fees "represent good value for money", and that the pre-application advice process is guided by a framework which sets out the timetable for meetings, key milestones and engagement with stakeholders.

At lower scales of development, the London/ non-London divide is even more stark. Of the 31 authorities which charge £1,000 or more for preapplication advice on schemes of five units, 26 are in London and only five are outside. For medium-sized housing schemes, Camden Council has the highest rates, charging a minimum of £3,709 for pre-application advice on five-unit schemes and £9,890 for ten-unit schemes. For pre-application advice on householder applications, the highest minimum rate is at the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, where the fee for such advice is £455.

Differences are also seen in non-residential categories. For a 1,000 sqm office proposal, pre-application advice will cost £3,000 or more at 16 authorities, 14 of which are London boroughs.

The outcome reflects different economics in different parts of the country, says Planning Officers Society chair Mike Kiely. "In London you are managing a vibrant and competitive market, and developers want to work with the local planning authority," he says. "A significant number of London boroughs will be pushing very high standards, with a really good process and development team approach, and developers are by-and-large willing to fund it."

Average minimum fees for pre-application advice also not surprisingly show a variation in charges depending on the scale of development proposals. A typical minimum fee for pre-application advice for householder applications is just under £100, a five-home scheme will cost on average a minimum of just over £700, and this rises to £2,000 for ten-home schemes. A major housing scheme of 100 units will see a much higher minimum fee for pre-application advice of over £3,500.


Councils report a variety of factors underpinning the fee structure they set. But cost recovery is the most widely cited rationale, and this cost is typically increased proportionately to the scale of the scheme involved. Other factors include benchmarking against other authorities and comparison with the council’s other planning charges. For example, Trafford Council reports that its fee for householder advice is capped at the planning application fee level for such schemes. South Gloucestershire Council reports that its fee is benchmarked against neighbouring and comparator authorities.

Martin Hutchings, improvement manager at the Local Government Association’s Planning Advisory Service, says he is not surprised by the survey findings. "One of the things developers complain about is that it’s a mixed picture as to what is provided and what you get for your payment," he says.

There is also a variety between authorities on the degree of clarity provided on fees and services provided at the outset, the survey shows. For instance, the larger fees being charged will usually cover written responses and meetings (sometimes two meetings for larger schemes). At the very largest scheme scale, some authorities introduce a bespoke range of charges and fees, and require this to be negotiated on a case-by-case basis, or to be subject to a planning performance agreement. For others, an initial fee is a starting point with further stated levels of service available at additional cost.

For example, Havering Council has just introduced a fee structure which includes a basic fee for an initial meeting for all applications of 25 units or more, where for a fee of £6,000 including VAT, the council provides services including a planning statement and a project plan.

But, as schemes increase in size, so do the fees and the services provided. So for large-scale schemes of 601-900 homes, a pre-application advice service is provided for a fee of £108,000 including VAT. The services provided under this fee include ten pre-submission meetings, a written response to the proposal, two presentations at the authority’s strategic planning committee to enable feedback from members to be taken into account, and a review of the submission documentation.

"The charges reflect the amount of officer time in the process," a spokesperson for Havering Council says. "The aim is to develop a scheme in collaboration with the developer so it has the greatest chance of being recommended for approval on submission. Typically this involves significant officer time over several months."

Kiely says higher fee levels will often provide a "premium" service, where dedicated planning officers are funded to deal with the application. For councils, he says, it is "important to be clear on what the service is".

"Developers are willing to fund pre-application advice where they get the service," says Kiely. Hutchings says one of the key issues for developers is to ensure that the relevant officers are in attendance at meetings, to offer advice on specialist areas such as transport and environment. Indeed, developers won’t pay pre-application advice fees unless they are guaranteed to have input from specialist professionals as part of the service, he says.

He adds that the most successful pre-application advice regimes are those which, rather than being seen as mechanism for generating income, are designed to make the planning application run more smoothly at later stages, and thus act as an investment for the authority by saving resources required later on in the process. "If you are doing it well," he says, "it will save money in the long-run, even if you are not charging for it."

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Join the conversation with PlanningResource on social media

Follow Us:
Planning Jobs