Permitted development and fallback positions examined by court

An inspector's decision to refuse a LDC confirming that various extensions to a property in Hertfordshire and within the metropolitan green belt and AONB was sound, the High Court has ruled, concluding that the correct approach to interpreting paragraph A.2(c) of Class A of Part 1 to schedule 2 of the GPDO 1995 had been followed. The inspector also refused to grant retrospective permission for the works.

This content can be viewed only by subscribers. Please sign in below or subscribe for full access

Sign in below

This page provides single sign-on for PlanningResource, DCP Online and COMPASS Online.

Having trouble signing in?

Forgotten password?

Refer to our Frequently Asked Questions. If you still require assistance:

For individual planning subscriptions please contact Customer Support at

For DCP Online, COMPASS Online and Corporate Planning subscriptions please contact

Don't Have an Account?

Take out a subscription today

Not sure yet? Take a free trial to PlanningResource

To discuss corporate subscriptions, call us on 01452 835820.

Planning Subscriber Activation

I subscribe to Planning - activate my subscription

Planning subscription expired? Call 0208 267 8121, or email us to renew