House in multiple occupation benefits from permitted development rights

In issuing an LDC for the erection of a rear extension and two sheds at a property in Middlesex an inspector confirmed that it benefited from permitted development rights under Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the GPDO 2008.

The council claimed that the property was in use as a house in multiple occupation (HMO). As a consequence it asserted that it was not a dwellinghouse and could not benefit from permitted development rights. It also asserted that the extension, taking into account the presence of a non-original single storey extension, would exceed the three metre limit set out in Class A of Part 1 of the order.

The inspector decided that a HMO, whether occupied by up to six residents and thus falling within Class C4 of the Use Classes Order or in excess of that number and thereby a sui generis use, comprised a dwellinghouse for the purpose of the GPDO. Only flats were expressly excluded from the order and there was no pre-condition stipulating that a dwellinghouse had to take a particular form. The garden sheds were therefore permitted under Class E and the extension, when assessed correctly, would not exceed the three metre limit specified in condition A.1(j). The appeal was allowed.

Inspector Paul Dignan; Written representations

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Sign up now
Already registered?
Sign in

Join the conversation with PlanningResource on social media

Follow Us:
Planning Jobs