Category:
customize
new topic join search today help faq
home
login
Author
Message Text For:
DC Forum Planning magazine 9 Feb 2007 - Dormer Windows
[ FORUMS : THREADS : REFRESH : NEXT THREAD ]
Posts: 28
From: london
Registered: Jun 2004
webmaster
Forum Member


Thursday, February 08, 2007 4:59 PM

View users profile Print this thread View thread in raw text format

Would you clarify the way that the volume limits for dormer windows under class B, part 1, schedule 2 of the General Permitted Development Order 1995 should be assessed, particularly where there is a garage within 5m of the dwellinghouse? My understanding is that the provisions of paragraph A.3(b) under class A do not apply and that only additions to the original dwellinghouse should be taken into account. Is this correct? ID

The application of this provision continues to cause difficulties and has given rise to inconsistencies in approach. Paragraph B.1(d) provides that the volume of the "resulting building" following a roof enlargement, which would include dormer windows, should not exceed the volume of the original dwellinghouse by specified amounts.

The "resulting building" is defined under the interpretation of part 1 at paragraph I as meaning the dwellinghouse as enlarged, improved or altered, "taking into account any enlargement, improvement or alteration to the original dwellinghouse", whether permitted by this part or not.

So it is necessary to consider whether there has been any enlargement to the original dwellinghouse under class A and, in accordance with paragraph A.3(b), whether that has brought it to within 5m of any existing curtilage building.

However, the practice of inspectors recently has been that where any garage within 5m of a dwellinghouse was built either before 1 July 1948 or at the same time as the original dwellinghouse, it will not be included within the "resulting building" and deducted from the permitted development allowance.




Reply
Quote
Report Abuse
Top
Bottom
Next
Previous
Posts: 74

Registered: Feb 2004
Mr Grumpy
Forum Member


Friday, February 09, 2007 1:46 PM

Print this thread View thread in raw text format

When you look at Classes of PD in the GPDO, do remember that each Class is a separate planning permission, that is not reliant on some other class for its interpretation - (Except, perhaps for Part 1, Class C, which makes no sense as a stand alone permission!). Thus porches that might be beyond the size limitations of Class D, could still be within the permission granted by Class A.

So, when you look at Class B, do not rely on the interpretation for Class A!
Thus, in calculating the volume of extensions under Class B you do not need to consider the size of freestanding buildings in proximity to the original dwelling.

There is some logic in this, in that the Class A extension could form a daisychain with detached buildings were it not for the A3 interpretation. Such a scenario could never arise in the case of an extension to the roof of a dwelling. - Not that I am suggesting there was any logic or clarity of thought in the drafting of Schedule 2!


Reply
Quote
Report Abuse
Top
Bottom
Next
Previous
[ FORUMS : THREADS : REFRESH : NEXT THREAD ]

To take part in the forum you need to register. You will automatically be asked to register when you reply to a forum message. Alternatively, you can register by clicking here.
FuseTalk 2.2 - Copyright © 1999-2001 e-Zone Media Inc. All rights reserved.
Back to Planning Resource