Decisions

Summaries of key development management decisions, including appeals, ombudsman reports, court judgements and Secretary of State decisions. Cases are selected and summarised by the COMPASS team. COMPASS is a fully indexed and searchable database of planning decisions.

For further information please call 01452 835 820 or email dcs@haymarket.com.

Sign up for the Appeals Casebook email bulletin.

Page Title RSS feed

Search 180,000 appeals on COMPASS

Latest Casebook Decision Summaries

Station redevelopment impact on cathedral setting judged acceptable

Plans to redevelop Guildford train station and create up to 438 dwellings along with improvements to the public realm were sanctioned after an examination of the likely impact on the town's cathedral.

Definition of assisted living accommodation considered in extra-care development

A development comprising 113 extra care units with staff accommodation and communal facilities in Devon was held by an inspector to fall within Class C2 and they were not, as contended by the council, dwellings within Class C3.

Holiday accommodation unsustainably located and harmful

Erecting three buildings containing 10 units of holiday accommodation in Northumberland would result in an unsustainable development which would also harm the character of the area, an inspector ruled, and rejected the appellant's claims that it would support the local economy.

Development Management Discussion Forum

PlanningResource's Development Management Forum allows users to raise new topics for discussion or comment on existing topics.

Development Management Discussion Forum

Development management answers: Curtilage query

Q. A planning condition removing all residential permitted development rights was imposed on a dwelling.

Legal Viewpoint

Legal Viewpoint: Judge clarifies duties on application amendments

Legal Viewpoint: Judge clarifies duties on application amendments

When do councils need to reconsult if a developer amends a planning application? The principle laid down in Wheatcroft v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another [1980] is that a permissible change to a planning application is one that does not make the application "in substance not that which was applied for".

Follow Us:

Fresh thinking on the DCP blog

  • In the first instance

    In allowing an appeal against the refusal of permission for the change of use of a semi-detached dwelling on a housing estate in southeast London to a house in multiple occupation...

  • Fuel to the fire

    Readers interested in the hot topic of whether the amalgamation of residential units to form a single dwelling is a material change of use might wish to note the outcome of an appeal...

  • Fine words

    As planners we strive for clarity and precision when writing committee reports and site appraisals, so it’s useful to keep a mental folder of relevant vocabulary. You might like to...

Planning Jobs