Decisions

Summaries of key development management decisions, including appeals, ombudsman reports, court judgements and Secretary of State decisions. Cases are selected and summarised by the COMPASS team. COMPASS is a fully indexed and searchable database of planning decisions.

For further information please call 01452 835 820 or email dcs@haymarket.com.

Sign up for the Appeals Casebook email bulletin.

Page Title RSS feed

Search 180,000 appeals on COMPASS

Latest Casebook Decision Summaries

Costs not awarded against West Berkshire for defending affordable housing policy

Two schemes for the redevelopment of a former pub to eight or nine dwellings in a large village was allowed after an inspector found a financial contribution towards affordable housing to be unjustified.

Functional relationship key in deciding annex is not a separate dwelling

Enforcement action against the change of use of a domestic outbuilding permitted as a games room in the back garden of a house in Sussex, to a separate dwelling house, was quashed by an inspector after applying case law.

Effect of large outbuilding on area character not relevant to LDC

An inspector granted a LDC for the construction of a single-storey outbuilding for use as a gymnasium, shower room, store and workshop/hobby room, in the back garden of an end-of-terrace dwelling house in London, and awarded costs to the appellant.

Development Management Discussion Forum

PlanningResource's Development Management Forum allows users to raise new topics for discussion or comment on existing topics.

Development Management Discussion Forum

Forum: Flag flying query

Q. We have received an advertisement application for a flagpole at a church on which it is the intention to fly a Union Jack. However, I think national flags no longer require advertisement consent. Should we process the application and, if so, what would the fee for the application be? MP

Legal Viewpoint

Legal Viewpoint: Helping councils hold their nerve on purchase orders

Legal Viewpoint: Helping councils hold their nerve on purchase orders

A Supreme Court ruling last month demonstrates the complexities of compulsory purchase law. The court unpicked a 2015 Court of Appeal ruling overturning an Upper Tribunal decision on compensation for land in Rochdale acquired as part of a larger development scheme. It found that the Court of Appeal misapplied section 6 of the Land Compensation Act 1961.

Follow Us:

Fresh thinking on the DCP blog

  • Important work

    Taken from a recent appeal decision (DCS Number 400-014-884 ):- “A signed and completed S106 Unilateral Undertaking has been submitted by the appellant. It would secure financial...

  • Comeuppance

    Comeuppance – a delightful old word which, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, derives from ‘come up’ in the sense of coming up before a judge or court for judgement....

  • Nothing in life is certain

    For those of us who thought that the decision in Oxfordshire County Council v Secretary for State for Communities and Local Government and others [2015] had settled the argument about...

Planning Jobs