Legal viewpoint: The murky waters of 106 repayments

Two recent High Court cases have dealt with repayment clauses in section 106 planning obligations. Last November, in Hampshire County Council v Beazer Homes, the court considered whether the developer was entitled to a refund of the unspent portion of a section 106 contribution towards highway works associated with a major development at Fleet.

This content can be viewed only by subscribers. Please sign in below or subscribe for full access

Sign in below

This page provides single sign-on for PlanningResource, DCP Online and COMPASS Online.

Having trouble signing in?

Forgotten password?

Refer to our Frequently Asked Questions. If you still require assistance:

For individual planning subscriptions please contact Customer Support at

For DCP Online, COMPASS Online and Corporate Planning subscriptions please contact

Don't Have an Account?

Take out a subscription today

Not sure yet? Take a free trial to PlanningResource

To discuss corporate subscriptions, call us on 01452 835820.

Planning Subscriber Activation

I subscribe to Planning - activate my subscription

Planning subscription expired? Call 0208 267 8121, or email us to renew