Latest Jobs
- Planning Assistant (Policy)
- East of England
- £26,067 to £28,919
- Senior Planner
- South East England
- up to £50,000 + benefits
- Senior DC planner
- South East England
- £30-£35
- Senior Town Planner – London – Private Planning Consultancy
- Central London
- Up to £45k + Bens
- Senior Town Planner – Bristol – Retail Sector
- South West England
- Up to £45k + Bens
- Minerals Town Planner – Cardiff, Wales – Multi-Disciplinary
- Wales
- up to £40k + Bens
- Charted Town Planner - Manchester
- North West England
- Up to £40k + Bens
- Senior RTPI Planning Consultant- Renewable Energies - Newcastle
- North East England
- Up to £45k + Bens
- Senior Town Planner – Birmingham, City
- West Midlands
- Up to £45k + Bens
- Town Planner – Biscester
- South East England
- Up to £30k + Bens
Planning, 18 July 2008
A two-storey building accommodating catering and food preparation areas on the ground floor and two flats above has been denied permission at a site in the New Forest because it would overshadow an adjoining bowling green.
The site lay to the rear of a public car park in a village and next to a bowling club. While accepting that the design was satisfactory, the inspector held that overshadowing could inhibit the growth of grass and restrict the club's ability to use the facility. As the building would be less than 2m from the club's boundary, he judged that it would be intrusive because occupants of the flats could look directly down onto the playing surface from their French windows.
He made a partial costs award in favour of the appellants after concluding that the national park authority had acted unreasonably in seeking a payment towards affordable housing. He noted that it had not challenged the appellants' viability appraisal, which demonstrated that abnormal costs associated with developing the site effectively ruled out any form of financial contribution.
The authority accepted at the inquiry that no financial contribution would be sought if an independent valuer agreed with the appellants' assessment, but then failed to obtain appropriate advice. In that light, the inspector felt that the appellants were entitled to rely on their own assessment, which demonstrated that any contribution would threaten the viability of the scheme.
DCS Number 100-055-935
Inspector Brendan Lyons; Inquiry.
This week's casebook
A-Z of Mineral & Waste Planning
Click here for your FREE entry to the A-Z of Mineral & Waste Planning
Get full decision
Latest News
- Milton flags capital renewable failings
- Westminster calls for Chelsea changes
- Burnley calls for gain cash
- Middle Quinton plan promoters respond to transport criticism
- Eco-village developer warns of resumption of aerodrome use
- Legal threat hangs over bypass inquiry
- Kerslake: UDCs should lose planning powers
- Enough brownfield land for 1 million homes, says report
- Consortium unveils rival Walthamstow plans
- Minister slams 'hysterical' environmentalists








