Latest Jobs
- Planning Assistant (Policy)
- East of England
- £26,067 to £28,919
- Senior Planner
- South East England
- up to £50,000 + benefits
- Senior DC planner
- South East England
- £30-£35
- Senior Town Planner – London – Private Planning Consultancy
- Central London
- Up to £45k + Bens
- Senior Town Planner – Bristol – Retail Sector
- South West England
- Up to £45k + Bens
- Minerals Town Planner – Cardiff, Wales – Multi-Disciplinary
- Wales
- up to £40k + Bens
- Charted Town Planner - Manchester
- North West England
- Up to £40k + Bens
- Senior RTPI Planning Consultant- Renewable Energies - Newcastle
- North East England
- Up to £45k + Bens
- Senior Town Planner – Birmingham, City
- West Midlands
- Up to £45k + Bens
- Town Planner – Biscester
- South East England
- Up to £30k + Bens
Planning, 18 July 2008
Temporary permission has been granted for the redevelopment of a cafe in north London even though the site lay along the line of a proposed pedestrian and cycle route.
The appeal site lay in an area identified as being of strategic importance for regeneration, growth and investment in the M11 corridor. The council observed that the site lay along the route of a planned high-quality pedestrian and cycle link that would be implemented before the London 2012 Olympics. The appeal proposal would effectively prejudice its ability to take forward the link, it claimed.
The inspector found that the cafe was a popular and much-appreciated refreshment facility, effectively serving as a canteen for workers employed nearby. However, it amounted to little more than a prefabricated structure similar to a mobile classroom. He considered that the appeal proposal, which would provide a two-storey building with a meeting room on the first floor, would improve the area's character and generate investment.
In his view, an area of parkland adjacent and other green space outside the site would afford enough room to enable the link to be constructed. Indeed, he noted that only a slight deviation to the alignment would divert it round the appeal site altogether. He concluded that a temporary permission was justified until the middle of 2013, reasoning that it would then be a matter for the appellant to assess whether the redevelopment scheme would be a viable investment.
DCS Number 100-056-167
Inspector David Lavender; Hearing.
This week's casebook
A-Z of Mineral & Waste Planning
Click here for your FREE entry to the A-Z of Mineral & Waste Planning
Get full decision
Latest News
- Milton flags capital renewable failings
- Westminster calls for Chelsea changes
- Burnley calls for gain cash
- Middle Quinton plan promoters respond to transport criticism
- Eco-village developer warns of resumption of aerodrome use
- Legal threat hangs over bypass inquiry
- Kerslake: UDCs should lose planning powers
- Enough brownfield land for 1 million homes, says report
- Consortium unveils rival Walthamstow plans
- Minister slams 'hysterical' environmentalists








