Latest Jobs
- Planning Assistant (Policy)
- East of England
- £26,067 to £28,919
- POLICY PLANNER - SOUTH LONDON
- £25.00 LTD (45K)
- Planning Liaison Consultant
- South East England
- Transport Policy and Projects Officer
- West Midlands
- £150 - £250 per day
- Senior Town Planner
- East of England
- £26800-35800K
- Assistant/Town Planner
- North West England
- £23-30k
- Partner - Planning
- Central London
- £85k+
- Community Planning and Liason Officer– Development Implementation
- Central London
- £33,777 - £36,474
- Major Project Officer – Development Implementation
- Central London
- £26,928 - £36,474
- Planning Policy Team Leader
- South West England
- £34,991 - £38,404pa
Planning, 9 May 2008
The continued use of two barns at a farm in the Hertfordshire green belt for processing bread and other bakery products to provide animal feed has been rejected as an unsustainable form of waste management.
The processing of waste bread began in 2003, when the farm had a dairy and beef herd. The inspector observed that the only permanent visual evidence of the use was a modestly sized piece of machinery attached to one of the barns that compacted and baled plastic wrappings. She accepted that this use had a negligible impact on openness and did not constitute inappropriate development in the green belt.
The appellant contended that the operation diverted a key waste from landfill and that recycling food waste for a commercial purpose met government aims to treat waste as a resource. But the inspector noted that the waste had previously been taken to a facility in Leicestershire, so no specific waste diversion or economic benefits could be directly attributed to the development. She also noted that the facility lacked ready access to the main road network.
In the absence of firmer evidence as to the origin of the waste, the inspector was not satisfied that the operation accorded with the aim of managing waste close to its source. She observed that the plastic wrappings littering a neighbouring bridleway and further afield were most unsightly. She considered that the scheme failed to minimise its impact on the local environment and judged that vehicle noise had a significant adverse effect on nearby residents' living conditions.
DCS Number 100-054-632
Inspector Kath Ellison; Inquiry.
This week's casebook
Get full decision
Latest News
- Wind sector stands by community cash
- Bill benefits to be set out
- Huge Wood Wharf scheme gets go ahead
- Farrell unveils Gateway parks masterplan
- NHPAU warns on second home ownership
- Tower Hamlets 'concerned' over City Airport decision
- Sutton facelift plans unveiled
- Tower Hamlets agrees new Conservation Areas
- Oxford library building brought to book
- Drake takes reins at RTPI








